The Boston Globe (via the Consumerist) has an interesting article on how the poor are punished for saving money, either through the 401(k)/403(b) program or just by plain saving their paychecks.
Some pretty startling tidbits from the article:
"We're constantly told that we need to save early and often to prepare for retirement...[y]et government policies tell low-income families, 'If you save for the future, you won't get our help today.' "
"For example, the tax credit for saving for retirement is wiped away when the taxpayer also qualifies for the earned income tax credit."
"[E]ach $1 saved by a single mother earning $15,000 a year would cost [a person] $2.60 in higher taxes and lost government benefits."
"...[P]utting a few dollars aside in a retirement plan can disqualify families for food stamps, healthcare benefits, and assistance given to poor families with children."
"In Massachusetts, for example, anyone with assets of $2,500 or more is disqualified from receiving federal assistance to families with dependent children. That asset test includes retirement accounts and even the cash value of a life insurance policy...[a]s a result, a single parent with two children who earns $500 a month would lose $133 a month in benefits if the family saved more than a nominal amount for retirement."
Employers love to assert that not putting money into a retirement plan is like leaving "free money" on the table, in the form of employer matches. For the poor, taking that "free money" is poison, as it will reduce or end their government benefits immediately. Putting in even 1% of their paycheck towards retirement - $2 a week for the woman earning $15,000 a year, and with a company match of 100% - is enough to reduce their benefits by 26%. Even maintaining an emergency account for expenses is enough to cause benefits to cease.
Truly sickening.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Brought to you by...
The Top 30 Gold Survey
-
►
2016
(1)
- ► April 2016 (1)
-
►
2014
(1)
- ► November 2014 (1)
-
►
2013
(8)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (3)
- ► January 2013 (3)
-
►
2012
(18)
- ► December 2012 (4)
- ► October 2012 (1)
- ► August 2012 (1)
- ► March 2012 (3)
- ► February 2012 (1)
- ► January 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(8)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► April 2011 (2)
- ► March 2011 (3)
- ► January 2011 (1)
-
►
2010
(16)
- ► December 2010 (1)
- ► October 2010 (2)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (1)
- ► April 2010 (1)
- ► February 2010 (3)
- ► January 2010 (1)
-
►
2009
(30)
- ► December 2009 (3)
- ► November 2009 (3)
- ► October 2009 (3)
- ► September 2009 (1)
- ► August 2009 (3)
- ► April 2009 (6)
- ► March 2009 (1)
- ► February 2009 (2)
- ► January 2009 (4)
-
►
2008
(34)
- ► December 2008 (4)
- ► November 2008 (2)
- ► October 2008 (2)
- ► September 2008 (2)
- ► August 2008 (1)
- ► April 2008 (5)
- ► March 2008 (3)
- ► February 2008 (4)
- ► January 2008 (4)
-
▼
2007
(64)
- ► December 2007 (5)
- ► November 2007 (2)
- ► October 2007 (1)
- ► September 2007 (4)
- ► August 2007 (3)
-
▼
June 2007
(11)
- The "We Hate Opposing Viewpoints" Doctrine
- Pros and Cons of Providence, RI
- Control freaks at Johns Hopkins University
- Cursing to the Choir, middle school edition
- Smug Kills, Same Sex Marriage Edition
- Just Plain Marriage, or Do You? Do You? Good, You'...
- Save for your future - unless you're poor, then yo...
- Why MCAS matters, and why it won't be going away a...
- Jail is not hot
- I ain't payin' $5 tax on a keg of Natty Light!
- Who "really hates freedom?" Control freaks, of co...
- ► April 2007 (10)
- ► March 2007 (10)
- ► February 2007 (1)
- ► January 2007 (5)
-
►
2006
(14)
- ► December 2006 (14)
No comments:
Post a Comment