Mayor Michael Bloomberg introduced an idea to limit soda sizes to 16 ounces. The limit is only for sugary drinks that have over 25 calories per 8 ounces. Diet sodas and water would likely exempted. However, the city of Cambridge thinks this is an equally delightful idea, would likely include ALL drinks, all the name of "the war on obesity."
But myopic rules like these don't work. They're designed to be stifling and show the laziness of governments not to do their research on health, to knee-jerk their way into control of the populace who consumes these drinks. This is why rules like this get ridiculed; no law is worse than when proposed by someone who doesn't like what others do (and is tyring to get money from the government to fund such cockeyed schemes) and try to control others.
Furthermore, by disguising these stiff laws as "it's for your own good," they hide the real motivation behind them, which is "we don't like what you're doing, regardless of it being harmless, and we'll prevent you from doing it any way we can." Types of laws like this usually devolve into resentment, confusion, and then revolt and black markets. See the prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s for an example of that success story.
A better idea would be to suggest that occasionally, a 20 ounce drink with as much sugar as your pancreas can handle is fine, so long as you balance it out during the day. That's better than being laughed at as a crank and a control freak.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Brought to you by...
The Top 30 Gold Survey
-
►
2016
(1)
- ► April 2016 (1)
-
►
2014
(1)
- ► November 2014 (1)
-
►
2013
(8)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (3)
- ► January 2013 (3)
-
▼
2012
(18)
- ► December 2012 (4)
- ► October 2012 (1)
- ► August 2012 (1)
- ► March 2012 (3)
- ► February 2012 (1)
- ► January 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(8)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► April 2011 (2)
- ► March 2011 (3)
- ► January 2011 (1)
-
►
2010
(16)
- ► December 2010 (1)
- ► October 2010 (2)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (1)
- ► April 2010 (1)
- ► February 2010 (3)
- ► January 2010 (1)
-
►
2009
(30)
- ► December 2009 (3)
- ► November 2009 (3)
- ► October 2009 (3)
- ► September 2009 (1)
- ► August 2009 (3)
- ► April 2009 (6)
- ► March 2009 (1)
- ► February 2009 (2)
- ► January 2009 (4)
-
►
2008
(34)
- ► December 2008 (4)
- ► November 2008 (2)
- ► October 2008 (2)
- ► September 2008 (2)
- ► August 2008 (1)
- ► April 2008 (5)
- ► March 2008 (3)
- ► February 2008 (4)
- ► January 2008 (4)
-
►
2007
(64)
- ► December 2007 (5)
- ► November 2007 (2)
- ► October 2007 (1)
- ► September 2007 (4)
- ► August 2007 (3)
- ► April 2007 (10)
- ► March 2007 (10)
- ► February 2007 (1)
- ► January 2007 (5)
-
►
2006
(14)
- ► December 2006 (14)
No comments:
Post a Comment